New paper finds evidence that amenities drive household migration
May 16, 2009 at 9:51 am | In Uncategorized | Leave a Comment“Local amenities and life-cycle migration: Do people move for jobs or fun?,” by Yong Chen and Stuart Rosenthal, published recently in the Journal of Urban Economics, uses national data from 1970 to 2000 to track household migration patterns. From the abstract: Do households move for jobs or fun, and where do they go when they move? We address these questions using the 1970–2000 US Census. Based on a panel of quality of life and business environment measures, households prefer MSAs in warm coastal areas and non-metropolitan locations, while firms prefer large, growing cities. In addition, cities with improving business environments acquire increasing shares of workers, especially workers with high levels of human capital; cities with improving consumer amenities become relatively more populated by retirees. Further analysis of individual level migration decisions indicates that regardless of marital status, young, highly educated households tend to move towards places with higher quality business environments. This tendency is especially pronounced among highly educated couples who are more subject to job market co-location problems. In contrast, regardless of education, couples near retirement tend to move away from places with favorable business environments and towards places with highly valued consumer amenities. These patterns help explain why areas unattractive to both households and business have struggled, as with upstate New York, while the sun-belt and other regions are thriving.
NYT Magazine personal account of foreclosure crisis
May 16, 2009 at 9:35 am | In neighborhoods | Leave a Comment
Edmund Andrews, an economics reporter for the New York Times, is facing foreclosure, after a series of bad decisions regarding the purchase of his house in DC. A first-person account in the NYT Magazine reveals how the organizational incentives of his mortgage broker generated options that seemed too good to pass up. If a well-paid, well-informed expert whose job it was to follow the actions of the Federal Reserve for the nation’s newspaper of record could hit rock bottom, how should we expect low-income neighborhoods to fare? See this report.
Welfare States in Transition Symposium – May 15, 2009
April 25, 2009 at 10:22 am | In conference, non-profits, welfare offices | Leave a CommentREGISTRATION IS NOW OPEN!
Please click below
https://ssanet.uchicago.edu/rsvp/centennial/event.cfm?eventid=090515
Registration is required for attendance.
The University of Chicago -School of Social Service Administration Centennial Welfare States in Transition: Social Policy Transformation in Organizational Practice
Friday, May 15, 2009
9:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. with reception to follow
The School of Social Service Administration
969 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
Organized by: Evelyn Brodkin, Associate Professor
Recent decades have witnessed a transformation in social policies and practices in the U.S. and internationally. Some of the most dramatic changes are occurring in policies that are reshaping the relationship between welfare and work. This symposium will examine this transformation, not only as enacted in law, but as enacted in practice. It will feature a series of papers and discussion that offer organizations-eye views of ways in which the changing relationship between welfare and work is being translated into practice in different states, cities, and in other countries.
The papers and discussion will consider shifts in both policy and practice, advancing new ways of thinking about the role of organizations in social policy transformation. As welfare and work policies have changed, so have the administrative arrangements under which they are implemented, arrangements increasingly constructed around new public management strategies of devolution, contracting, and performance measurement. How are these changes in policy and practice redefining the relationship between disadvantaged citizens, the state, and the market?
This symposium brings together researchers examining welfare-to-work as a global policy trend and new public management as a global administrative trend. It provides a forum for a discussion of the effects of these trends and their implications for future efforts to address poverty, inequality, and marginalization.
Confirmed Speakers:
Michael Adler
School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh – Scotland
Martin Brussig
University of Duisburg-Essen, Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation (Institute for Work, Skills and Training) – Germany
Joel Handler
University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), School of Law and School of Public Affairs – USA
Yeheskel Hasenfeld
University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), School of Public Affairs, Department of Social Welfare – USA
Henning Jorgenson
Aalborg University, Centre for Labour Market Research (CARMA) – Denmark
Petra Kaps
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (Social Science Research Center Berlin), Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung (Institute for Labor Market Policy and Employment) – Germany
Matthias Knuth
University of Duisburg-Essen,Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation (Institute for Work, Skills and Training) – Germany
Susan Lambert
University of Chicago, School of Social Service Administration – USA
Flemming Larsen
Aalborg University, Centre for Labour Market Research (CARMA) – Denmark
Michael Lipsky
Demos, Center for the Public Sector, and Georgetown University, Public Policy Institute – USA
Gregory Marston
University of Queensland, School of Social Work and Human Services – Australia
Jennifer Mosley
University of Chicago, School of Social Service Administration – USA
William Sites
University of Chicago, School of Social Service Administration – USA
C.C.A.M. (Els) Sol
University of Amsterdam, Hugo Sinzheimer Institute – Netherlands
Joe Soss
University of Minnesota, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs – USA
Ludo Struyven
Catholic University of Leuven, Higher Institute of Labour Studies – Belgium
H.H.A. (Rik) van Berkel
Utrecht University, School of Governance – Netherlands
Celeste Watkins-Hayes
Northwestern University, Departments of Sociology and African-American Studies – USA
This Symposium is sponsored in part by the Danish Social Science Research Council and RESq – an international research network studying reform of employment services and social welfare policy.
Contact 001.773.702.1166 or centennial@ssa.uchicago.edu with
questions.
http://ssacentennial.uchicago.edu/events/symposium-brodkin.shtml
New paper: Availability of healthy foods may decrease hypertension
March 28, 2009 at 8:28 am | In amenities, food deserts, grocery stores, health, hypertension, neighborhoods, supermarkets | Leave a Comment“Neighborhood Characteristics and Hypertension,” authored by Mahasin Mujahid and others, was recently published in Epidemiology. From the abstract: The goal of this study was to investigate cross-sectional associations between features of neighborhoods and hypertension and to examine the sensitivity of results to various methods of estimating neighborhood conditions. We used data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis on 2612 individuals 45-85 years of age…. Neighborhood (census tract) conditions potentially related to hypertension (walking environment, availability of healthy foods, safety, social cohesion) were measured using information from a separate phone survey conducted in the study neighborhoods…. Residents of neighborhoods with better walkability, availability of healthy foods, greater safety, and more social cohesion were less likely to be hypertensive.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Sarah Reckhow’s “


