We’ve moved!

March 28, 2011 at 11:26 am | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The new portal, part of an endeavor at the University of Chicago to spur creative research in urban social science, is here:
http://urban.uchicago.edu
.

Where have we been?

January 19, 2011 at 9:00 pm | Posted in news, what to read, what to watch | Leave a comment

You’ve probably noticed that we have been quiet for the last several months.  We’ve been working hard designing and creating the content for a completely revamped website.  In the coming weeks, we’ll announce the (beta?) launch of an online portal designed to be a resource for social scientists, journalists, activists, practitioners, policy makers, and others interested in urban social science.  Much of the work of UrbaOrgs will transfer to that site, which will be hosted by the University of Chicago.  Stay tuned for more!

Rethinking urban poverty from institutional and organizational perspectives

January 19, 2011 at 2:23 pm | Posted in barbershops, conference, economic development, grocery stores, health, housing, immigrants, neighborhoods, non-profits, organizational density, organizational networks, political organizations, poverty, social capital, social service agencies | Leave a comment

Urban organizations conference in Chicago! “The University of Chicago is hosting a conference entitled “Rethinking Urban Poverty for the 21st Century: Institutional and Organizational Perspectives” on March 10-11, 2011.  As we enter the second decade of the 21st century, the prospects for U.S. cities remain uncertain. The promised reinvention of many former manufacturing centers has been halted in its tracks, as record budget deficits, limited growth prospects, and stubbornly high unemployment rates undermine urban recovery. The urban poor continue to bear most heavily the burden of a continuing housing crisis, chronically underperforming schools at a time of increasing returns to education, persistently high births to unmarried mothers, unprecedented rates of obesity and other health problems, and an expansion of the criminal justice system that insists on breaking imprisonment records.   Understanding these conditions calls for scholarly perspectives the focus not only on individuals or neighborhoods but also on the institutions and organizations that structure their daily lives, mediate their relation to the state, and facilitate or constrain their ability to acquire resources. The papers either adopt or examine the role of institutional and organizational perspectives to the study of housing, health, criminal justice, education, and immigration in urban contexts. For more, and to register, see
http://urbanforums.uchicago.edu
.”

Save the date!

October 15, 2010 at 1:17 pm | Posted in conference | Leave a comment

March 10-11, 2011.  The University of Chicago will host a conference on organizational interventions in urban poverty for the 21st century.  Organizers are lining up a stellar set of speakers.  More to come soon….

From the streets of Oakland

October 9, 2010 at 10:50 pm | Posted in police, what to watch, youth | Leave a comment

 

City and Community article encourages new thinking on African American residential patterns before the Civil Rights Era

September 29, 2010 at 6:28 pm | Posted in cities, geography, housing, neighborhoods, race, what to read | Leave a comment

In the newly published article, “African American Locational Attainment Before the Civil Rights Era,” (City & Community, volume 9, September 2010), Lance Freeman challenges conventional wisdom that prior to the Civil Rights era, blacks of all classes lived side-by-side due to intense discrimination. According to this view, individual socioeconomic status did not translate into improved locational outcomes. By analyzing individual-level data from the 1910-1950 Public Use Microdata Samples, Freeman reveals how individual-level socioeconomic status translated into neighborhood-level outcomes for blacks. Among blacks, individual-level socioeconomic status played no role in determining residential proximity to whites. However, individual-level socioeconomic status for blacks was an important determinant of other neighborhood outcomes. His ground-breaking research suggests that upper-stratum blacks did indeed live in neighborhoods set apart from poorer blacks.

More information about this article available at:


http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2010.01329.x/abstract

Why many approaches to building social capital probably won’t work

September 24, 2010 at 5:54 pm | Posted in childcare centers, new books, social capital, what to read | Leave a comment

A new paper by Mario L. Small in the Royal Society of the Arts journal makes the case that many of the suggestions put forth to build social capital have little hope of success.  The reason?  Today, most people are too busy to build social capital, even if they think doing so would be a good idea.  Figuring out how to build social capital requires seriously reconsidering how people actually create and sustain those social bonds that end up being useful, trustworthy, and productive.  Based on his research on the unanticipated roles childcare centers played in structuring the networks of mothers, he suggests that would-be social capitalists shift attention from the individual to the routine organization.  As Matthew Taylor puts it, the best way to build social capital may be “by accident.”  See also commentary in the Social Capital Blog.

Study finds that neighborhood organizations are strong predictors of social capital

August 24, 2010 at 11:08 am | Posted in amenities, grocery stores, neighborhoods, social organization, social service agencies, supermarkets, what to read | Leave a comment

In a new study published in the Journal of Urban Affairs, Alexandra Curley studies social capital levels among participants in a Boston housing relocation program.  From the abstract: “This article examines the social capital available to low-income households which were relocated to different types of neighborhoods with the HOPE VI program, an initiative aimed at redeveloping U.S. public housing developments into mixed-income communities. Along with improving the living environment, HOPE VI is thought to improve residents’ access to social capital by changing the economic mix of their neighborhoods. This article contributes evidence from multivariate analyses of survey data of Boston HOPE VI residents in their post-HOPE VI neighborhoods. Findings indicate that rather than neighborhood socioeconomic mix, neighborhood resources, such as libraries, recreation facilities, parks, grocery stores, and social services, followed by place attachment and feelings of safety,were the strongest predictors of social capital….”

Is the Harlem Children’s Zone a waste of money?

August 8, 2010 at 1:25 pm | Posted in childcare centers, education, geography, neighborhoods, organizational networks, social service agencies, youth | Leave a comment

Geoffrey Canada’s effort to transform the lives of low-income children in Harlem by providing a comprehensive array of services within a 100 block area has convinced many skeptics, produced a top seller, and inspired a presidential effort.  A new controversial report by the Urban Institute suggests it may have been a waste of money, at least with respect to its effects on education.  After comparing the test performance of children in the Harlem Children’s Zone Promise Academy to those in other New York City charter schools, the authors conclude, rather uncharitably, “that the HCZ Promise Academy is a middling New York City charter school.”  Canada responds, calling the report “wrong-headed,” for, among other things, misunderstanding the point of the HCZ.  Whitehurst and Croft promptly reply, standing their ground.  Considering that Obama has requested $210 million for the initiative inspired by HCZ, and that Congress seems reluctant to provide it, we really ought to get the story straight.

A new frontier in the analysis of urban nightlife establishments

July 9, 2010 at 2:57 pm | Posted in amenities, cities, consumption, culture, geography, race, reading list, social capital, what to read | 1 Comment

In “The Nightly Round: Space, Social Capital, and Urban Black Nightlife,” sociologist Marcus Hunter uses participant observation and semistructured interviews to consider the ways in which nightlife is used to mitigate the effects of social and spatial isolation, complementing the accomplishment of the daily round. Through an analysis of the nightly round—a process encompassing the social interactions, behaviors, and actions involved in going to, being in, and leaving the club—Hunter demonstrates that understanding the ways in which urban blacks use space in the nightclub to mediate racial segregation, sexual segregation, and limited social capital expands our current understanding of the spatial mobility of urban blacks as well as the important role of extra-neighborhood spaces in such processes. Further, the article highlights the ways that urban blacks use space in the nightclub to leverage socioeconomic opportunities and enhance social networks. While Hunter found that black heterosexual and lesbian and gay patrons used space in similar ways, black lesbians and gays were more likely to use the club as a space to develop ties of social support. The article can be found in the June 2010 issue of City and Community (volume 9, number 2).

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.