Impressive service provides rich data on nearly every business in U.S., other countries
August 28, 2009 at 6:38 pm | Posted in amenities, barbershops, beauty salons, childcare centers, data | 1 CommentWant to find out how many large supermarkets are located within 5 miles of a given address? Or how much each of the barbershops in Harlem did in sales last year? Or how many employees each of the banks in Chicago’s South Side has? Or how about the credit rating of all small retail shops in South Central Los Angeles? Or the number of Lutheran churches in Minneapolis with more than two personal computers? Check out ReferenceUSA, which provides what they claim is the world’s most comprehensive data on U.S. businesses and organizations (around 14 million). Designed for commercial purposes, there are limitless possibilities for scholars interested in neighborhood conditions, spatial analysis, labor issues, and urban conditions more generally. Their data are assembled from phone directories, county courthouses, public record notices, and others. A team of 600 researchers works full time on maintaining and updating the database. Check out their promotional video on data quality. (The service also has personal residential data on 100 million U.S. households, the type of data used by telemarketers. You can send them an email to remove your name.) Urbanorgs researchers will want to know that the business data are very easy to download (in Excel, tab delmited, and other formats) and remarkably rich. From their website: “The lists include business name and phone number, complete address, key executive name, SIC code, employee size, sales volume, business expenditures and much more. In addition… geo-codes for mapping, fax and toll-free numbers, website address, franchise and brand information, headline news, liens, judgements and bankruptcies, email addresses, number of computers, work-at-home businesses, and business credit rating scores.” Many libraries subscribe to the service. The more obscure data are not available for every organization, but what is available is impressive. (Updated)
Like this:
1 Comment »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About
This site supports an informal network of scholars independently doing research on formal organizations and inequality in urban contexts. Topics include gentrification, immigration, amenities, well-being, social networks, non-profit organizations, social capital, organizational density, politics, crime and punishment, housing, community building organizations, and governance. Maintained by Mario L. Small and Celeste Watkins-Hayes.Get on the list
From Google News: Urban neighborhoods
From Google News: Urban inequalityCategories
- amenities
- ASA
- barbershops
- beauty salons
- breast cancer
- childcare centers
- churches
- cities
- conference
- consumption
- creative class
- culture
- data
- economic development
- education
- food deserts
- gangs
- geography
- grocery stores
- health
- housing
- hypertension
- immigrants
- job centers
- job search
- neighborhoods
- new books
- news
- non-profits
- NYT
- obesity
- organizational density
- organizational networks
- personality
- police
- political organizations
- poverty
- prison system
- race
- RC-21
- reading list
- scenes
- social capital
- social movements
- social organization
- social service agencies
- supermarkets
- Uncategorized
- welfare offices
- what to read
- what to watch
- youth
Archives
- March 2011
- January 2011
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Very cool. I wonder how they were able to retrieve such rich data (e.g., expenditures) for so many businesses. Thanks for pointing this out.
Comment by brayden— August 29, 2009 #